Skip to main content
Commercial Genetic Test Validation

Pfizer GeneSTAR Marbling MVP:

Summary:

There was no significant association of this test with the trait of Marbling Score in any of the validation populations. However, the GeneSTAR Marbling MVP[1] was found to be significantly associated with percent intramuscular fat (%IMF) in a Bos indicus- influenced, and one of two Bos Taurus populations. Additionally this test was found to be significantly associated with the quality grade (% choice or better) in the Bos indicus- influenced population o f 394 animals, but not the Bos taurus “B” validation population.

Significance of the GeneSTAR Marbling MVP* (Molecular Value Prediction)

Population

TRAIT

Panel

b**

F

p

N

North American Bos taurus
“Pfizer A” validation population

Marbling score***

Marbling

-0.267

3.15

0.961

595

% IMF

Marbling

0.193

1.76

0.094

282

North American
Bos taurus
PfizerBvalidation population

Marbling score

Marbling

.120

1.1

0.147

723

% Choice

-0.032

0.1

0.624

723

% IMF

0.312

5.26

0.011

785

North American
Bos indicus
-influenced
“Pfizer C” validation
population

Marbling score

Marbling

0.367

1.73

0.096

392

% Choice

0.276

3.68

0.028

392

% IMF

0.659

9.83

0.001

394

* Molecular prediction values (MVP) were provided by Pfizer Animal Genetics based on their 56 SNP panel for Marbling Score, Tenderness and Net Feed intake (residual feed intake).

**The column labeled ‘b’ is the regression of phenotypes in the test population on the MVPs reported for the DNA test. It is a measure of how well the MVP scales with the phenotype. There are many reasons that this value would differ from its nominally expected value of 1. Traits scale differently in different environments, management scenarios and methods of measurement. Therefore, we would not practically expect this value to be exactly 1. However, values substantially less than 1 suggest that differences in phenotypes observed in other cattle managed under conditions representative of U.S. beef production are likely to be less than those predicted by the MVP. This would not affect how animals would be ranked by the MVP, but would impact the weighting given to differences in MVPs relative to differences in EPDs based on phenotypic data.

*** Degree of intramuscular fatness in the longissimus dorsi (ribeye muscle).

1MVP (Molecular Value Prediction) is equivalent to the term Molecular Breeding Value (MBV) used by the NBCEC.

Test Claims:

The GeneSTAR Marbling MVP provides a prediction of the genetic breeding value for marbling (measured as marbling score) in all breeds of cattle.

Test Details:

The GeneSTAR Marbling MVP is derived from analysis of a 56 SNP marker panel designed to provide MVPs for tenderness, marbling score and net feed intake (residual feed intake).

Sample Populations*:

  • North American Bos taurus “Pfizer A” validation population
    Subjective marbling score 1 to 10
    Ultra-sound marbling estimate
  • North American Bos taurus “Pfizer B” validation population
  • North American Bos indicus-influenced “Pfizer C” validation population

*Letter-designations for validation populations as described in Pfizer Technical Summary (February 2009).

Quantiles for GeneSTAR Marbling Molecular Value Prediction*

Population

Panel

Mean

Max

 75% (Q3)

Median  (Q2)

25%   (Q1)

Min

North American Bos taurus
“Pfizer A” validation population

Marbling

n/a

0.729

0.107

 0.0006

-0.112

 -0.545

North American
Bos taurus
“Pfizer B”validation population

Marbling

-0.059

0.383

0.07

-0.054

-0.186

-0.596

North American
Bos indicus
-influenced
“Pfizer C” validation
population

Marbling

-0.13

0.415

0.003

-0.142

-0.271

-0.688

 *Molecular value predictions (MVPs) were provided by Pfizer Animal Genetics based on their 56 SNP panel for Marbling Score, Tenderness and Net Feed intake (residual feed intake). These were the MVP distributions in the data analyzed and are not necessarily reflective of those of any other population.

Significance of the GeneSTAR Marbling MVP* (Molecular Value Prediction)

Population

TRAIT

Panel

b**

F

p

N

North American Bos taurus
“Pfizer A” validation population

Marbling score

Marbling

 -0.267

 3.15

0.961 

595

% IMF

Marbling

0.193 1.76 0.094

282

North American Bos taurus
PfizerBvalidation population

Marbling score

Marbling

.120

1.1

0.147

723

% Choice

-0.032

0.1

0.624

723

% IMF

0.312

5.26

0.011

785

North American Bos indicus-influenced     “Pfizer C” validation
population

Marbling Score

Marbling

0.367

1.73

0.096

392

% Choice

0.276

3.68

0.028

392

% IMF

0.659

9.83

0.001

394

*Molecular value predictions (MVPs) were provided by Pfizer Animal Genetics based on their 56 SNP panel for Marbling Score, Tenderness and Net Feed intake (residual feed intake). The F test is based on a model including fixed contemporary group, random sire, and the regression of GeneSTAR Marbling MVP for the trait in question (January 2009).

**The column labeled ‘b’ is the regression of phenotypes in the test population on the MVPs reported for the DNA test. It is a measure of how well the MVP scales with the phenotype. There are many reasons that this value would differ from its nominally expected value of 1. Traits scale differently in different environments, management scenarios and methods of measurement. Therefore, we would not practically expect this value to be exactly 1. However, values substantially less than 1 suggest that differences in phenotypes observed in other cattle managed under conditions representative of U.S. beef production are likely to be less than those predicted by the MVP. This would not affect how animals would be ranked by the MVP, but would impact the weighting given to differences in MVPs relative to differences in EPDs based on phenotypic data.

Analysis of validation population A was performed by Gordon VanderVoort, Matt Kelly, Duc Lu and Stephen Miller, University of Guelph (July 2008) using the following model:

    Trait=aet+tty+heterosis+AN+PI+SM+CH+sex+mbv
    Where: aet = linear regression of the age at end of test
    tty – effect of contemporary group including year, trial and treatment within trial
    heterosis – linear regression of degree of breed heterozygosity based on parental breed composition
    AN+PI+SM+CH – linear regression coefficients on the proportion of the most prominent breeds represented (in animal i)
    Sex –heifer, bull or steer
    MBV – Prediction of genetic merit based on SNP provided by Bovigen.

The remaining populations were analyzed by NBCEC using on a model including fixed contemporary group, random sire, and the regression of GeneSTAR tenderness MVP for the trait in question (January 2009).